
The prophet Amos provides us with the first clue in our search for an answer to the rich man's dilemma. The Gospel text describes the man's lifestyle as one of great feasting and enjoyment in physical pleasures. Amos details well the life of a person of wealth in his time and in any age: they place a great deal of importance in providing for themselves the best of everything for their bodies that they overlook the needs of their souls and the needs of the poor who exist all around them. As the spiritual writer Francis Fernandez points out, "He lived for himself as if God did not exist. He had completely forgotten the fact that we are not owners of what we have, but only administrators." (In Conversation with God, vol. 5, p. 118)
Paul encourages Timothy not to forget the reality of God. God alone is immortal and unapproachable. We cannot live as if we are some deity who cannot be approached by others, nor can we live our lives as if we will never die. For we will die one day and we will need to answer the fundamental questions of our life: did we feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, clothe the naked, visit the imprisoned, shelter the homeless, welcome the stranger, and care for the ill? The rich have an obligation to share the good things God has given to them with those who have nothing at all. If we live a life of simplicity and detachment, "we will be able to live solidarity with those who suffer, with the poor and the sick, with the marginalized and the oppressed. Our sensitivity will grow. It will not be so hard for us to see Jesus Christ in the needy person in frontof us. It is Christ who speaks to us those memorable words, 'As long as you did it for these the least of my brethren, you did it for me (Mt. 25: 40). These will be our credentials on the day of judgment. We will all understand at that time that Heaven is reserved for those who loved their brothers in deeds and in truth." (A. Fuentes, The Christian Meaning of Wealth, 1988)
The sad fate of the rich man is highlighted in multiple ways by the Gospel writer. First, Luke gives the poor man a name, Lazarus, while the rich man remains nameless in the story. The lack of a name indicates how insignificant in reality this rich man is, though he sees himself as important in his own eyes. Second, the man fails to grasp his own situation even in the bad side of Sheol. He orders Abraham as if the patriarch were a servant of his - first to have his thirst relieved, then to appear to his family in order to warn them. The response of Abraham is equally telling: first, he tells the rich man about the great chasm that divides them, a great irony since in this mortal life the rich man had created a great chasm between himself and Lazarus. Second, Abraham reminds him of all the teachings and examples of the Jewish tradition that could prevent his family from suffering the same fate as he. If they could not believe the great signs of salvation histoy, they cannot come to faith through the resurrection of one man.
Complacency leads us eventually to think of ourselves as far greater than we are in reality, thereby leading us to forget God and the needs of others. St. Augustine came to realize the folly of his rich lifestyle and renounced it all for the sake of God and others. Let us unite our prayer to his as we pray for the resolution to live for others and not for ourselves: "How lovely I suddenly found it, to be free from the glamour of those vanities, so that not it was a joy to renounce what I had been so much afraid to lose. For you cast them out of me, O true and supreme Loveliness, you cast them out of me and took their place instead, you who are sweeter than all pleasure, yet not to mere flesh and blood; brighter than all light, yet deeper within than any secret, loftier than all honor, but not to those who are high and mighty in their own estimation." (St. Augustine, Confessions, 9, 1, 1)