Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Fourth Sunday in Advent - Year C

“I Come to Do Your Will, O God”

As we arrive at the final days of Advent, a season of expectation, we would do well to ask ourselves, “What have we been waiting for?” The question is a fair one, given the fact that Jesus has already been born incarnate two-thousand years ago, and we know neither the day nor the hour of his second coming. How can we expect an event that has already occurred or an event whose coming is clouded in unknowing?

The answer lies in the fact that while Jesus has been born incarnate centuries ago, he has yet to be born in our hearts and lives today. Every Christian has to make the message of the incarnation his or her own. Today’s readings make that fact abundantly clear. In each case we meet a humble person or place who has received the message of receiving the Messiah. Bethlehem, the lowliest place, will become the location for the Messiah’s coming in the first reading from the prophet Micah. St. Paul summarizes the entire prophetic tradition of Israel in today’s second reading: God desires not sacrifices and offerings, but a will entirely devoted to Him.

The Gospel reading presents us with the one human being who exemplifies this lesson of the first two readings. The Blessed Virgin Mary accepted the will of God completely in her life and became the Mother of God. She brought forth the incarnate Word of God into the world. Yet, when she received this message, Mary did not exalt in her own gift, but immediately set out to visit and serve her cousin Elizabeth. Mary brought forth Christ in the flesh and in her deeds for others.

That example of Mary provides us with our own goal for the Advent and Christmas season. The Lord Jesus must be born in our hearts and we must bring him forth into the world through our words and deeds. The authentic Christian life is one that incarnates Christ again in the world by corresponding to God’s grace, surrendering to God’s will, and performing the deeds of justice, love, and mercy. The angel did not ask Mary about her theory of God or any other proposition. Instead, she was asked to surrender to God’s will and to make Christ present to the world. That is the duty of every Christian. As Pope Benedict XVI stated in reference to the final judgment parable of Matthew 25, “In this parable, the judge does not ask what kind of theory a person held about God and the world. He is not asking about a confession of dogma, solely about love. That is enough, and it saves a man. Whoever loves is a Christian. However great the temptation may be for theologians to quibble about this statement, to provide it with ifs and buts, notwithstanding: we may and should accept it in all its sublimity and simplicity, quite unconditionally – just as the Lord posited it” (What it Means to be Christian, p. 68-69).

The real tragedy of the Advent and Christmas season isn’t over whether a person says “Merry Christmas” or “Happy Holidays”, or whether public nativity displays will be allowed or whether kids can sing Christmas carols in public schools. The great tragedy will be that we failed to allow Christ to be born in our hearts and into the world through our deeds of justice, love, and mercy. Let us beg for this grace so that the real meaning of Christmas may be forthcoming and we fulfill our human vocation. May our prayer be that of St. Ambrose: “O Mary, you did not doubt, you believed and received the just reward of your faith. ‘Blessed are you that have believed.’ But we too are blessed because we have heard and have believed: every soul that believes, conceives and begets the word of God, and recognizes his works. O Mary, obtain for each of us your spirit of glorifying the Lord; that each of us may have your spirit of rejoicing in God. Through you alone are Mother of Christ physically, yet through faith Christ is begotten by all; help me, O Mary, to receive within me the Word of God” (St. Ambrose, Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, II, 26).

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Why Rejoice?

The Third Sunday of Advent is traditionally called “Gaudete” Sunday based on the Latin word that is the first word of today’s entrance antiphon: “Rejoice in the Lord always!” In the midst of the penitential season of Advent and as we approach the darkest day of the year at the Winter Solstice, the Church encourages us to rejoice. Why on earth should we be rejoicing at this particular time? Once again, the readings chosen for the day provide us with the answer.

The first reading from the prophet Zephaniah is a cheerful passage in the midst of a prophetic book that is otherwise quite dour. The prophet Zephaniah appears in Judah before the Babylonian captivity to warn the people of Israel to stop worshipping false gods and to repent of the injustices they are committing against others. In the midst of that warning comes this passage about rejoicing, even though God’s judgment is imminent upon Israel. He urges the people to rejoice in Israel’s future deliverance because “the king of Israel, the Lord, is in your midst, you have no further misfortune to fear.” The age of the Messiah will bring forth this confidence: God is with us, and we must rejoice because God is present, even in the darkest hour.

Paul’s letter to the Philippians was written while Paul was in prison, and yet he urges the Christian community to rejoice because “the Lord himself is near. Dismiss all anxiety from your minds.” The Lord is near not in the sense of his second coming, but rather because God is spiritually and physically near to us in all our needs. Why, then, should we fear anything? Very often we are afraid because we have looked for happiness in things that cannot really make us happy. As the spiritual writer Francis Fernandez states, “We need a firm foundation for our happiness. It cannot depend exclusively on changeable circumstance like good news, good health, peace and quiet, enough money to bring up the family comfortably and having all the material possessions we would like. All these things are good in themselves if they do not separate us from God, but they are unable to provide us with real happiness” (In Conversation with God, vol. 1, p. 115).

The Gospel reading provides us with a group of people who had a comfortable life and then some. From a material point of view, the tax collectors who come to John the Baptist had it good, and yet we find them coming to John looking for authentic happiness. John urges those who come to him to practice the deeds of justice and mercy in preparation for the coming Messiah who will bring judgment upon his arrival. Luke states that John “preached the good news to the people.” The Greek word for “good news” was used by secular rulers to denote messages of salvation from secular rulers and the Roman emperor. In adopting this term to denote the message and work of Jesus the Messiah, the New Testament writers again challenge the structures of the day: salvation and peace – good news – come only from God through Jesus the Messiah, not from the secular realm.

As we await the coming of the Messiah at Christmas, let us remember that he is already near and present to us. We need not fear as we practice the works of justice and mercy in our world that needs them so desperately. If we have not been as diligent in those practices, now is the time to begin. Let us conclude our reflection with words from the theologian Karl Rahner, “For the Lord has come and yet he is still coming. He is already here, but is in our midst, still, as the hidden God; and so we are still men who have no lasting city here, pilgrims between time and eternity, men who must still await God’s coming, men who keep Advent even at Christmastime and must remember that we are still at the beginnings, still on pilgrimage; that we must make our way through time, amid sorrow and distress, but with a heart full of faith, toward the eternal light that still awaits us. What this means is that eternity is not yet here. But it does not mean that we must not cherish the light that is already lit, and it does not mean that we ought to turn our backs upon this world. It means that we ought not to neglect the other light…You are here. You are the Lord of my faith, you are my strength and delight. You are the Christmas in the Advent of my existence” (Biblical Homilies, p. 65, 67).

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Second Sunday of Advent - The Road Not Taken


"Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,

And sorry I could not travel both


And be one traveler, long I stood


And looked down one as far as I could


To where it bent in the undergrowth;





Then took the other, as just as fair,


And having perhaps the better claim,


Because it was grassy and wanted wear;


Though as for that the passing there


Had worn them really about the same,





And both that morning equally lay


In leaves no step had trodden black,


Oh, I kept the first for another day!


Yet knowing how way leads on to way,


I doubted if I should ever come back.





I shall be telling this with a sigh


Somewhere ages and ages hence:


Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -


I took the one less traveled by,


And that has made all the difference.


(Robert Frost)





The theme for this Sunday's Mass certainly has parallels to this poem from Robert Frost. Both the first reading and the Gospel have to do with preparing and traveling on roads. The historical context of each reading provides us with a rich background for better understanding their theological meaning.


Baruch is writing to the Israelites who are in captivity in Babylon. The nation of Israel has been brought low due to its following of false gods and the injustices they commit against others. The prophet provides a message of hope by envisioning a road back to a restored Israel from their place of captivity. Baruch has no timetable for such an event; only the hope that God would someday restore his people and liberate them from outside oppression and from their sins. Following the road to Jerusalem - the road made by God - is the way of salvation.


The Gospel reading from Luke is situated within a very specific time period offered by the Evangelist. Luke reminds the readers of the oppressive times in which John the Baptist came preaching. The Jewish people were under harsh occupation by the Romans, and they suffered much at the hands of Pilate and Herod. During this time the image of the road had a specific context: only the Romans build roads, and they did so to prepare a way for their army and the coming of the Emperor's reign in a land. The Jewish readers saw these roads being built and knew what those roads brought.


Now, however, John the Baptist comes and proclaims the coming of the Messiah using the prophetic image of the road from Baruch: "Prepare the way of the Lord; make straight his path." The Lord here is not the Roman emperor but the coming Messiah. The message John preaches - and one that Luke reiterates fifty years later - is a direct challenge to the Roman occupation: the peace and salvation of Israel will not come from Roman roads but from the way of the Lord.


Jesus is the Messiah the prophets foretold and expected. If we put aside our false hopes that we put in political leaders and place that hope in Christ, we will find the blessings of the promised Messianic age. These blessings Paul prays for in the new Christian community: "that your love may increase ever more and more in knowledge and every kind of perception to discern what is of value so that you may be pure and blameless for the day of Christ, filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ for the glory and praise of God."


What road will we choose to travel upon? Will we choose the popular road of worldly expectations and political messiahs, or will we choose the road less traveled by, the road upon which Christ traveled to Calvary where we find our salvation and our hope? May our prayer be that of St. Augustine's: "Only one thing do I ask, only one thing, I say, do I desire: that you scorn not the works of your hand. Preserve me in your good work, not mine; because by looking at mine you may condemn me; looking at yours, you will give me a crown. Since whatever is good in me all comes to me from you, it is therefore more yours than mine...Through your goodness I have been saved by means of faith, not through any merit of mine, but through your gift; not in virtue of my works lest I become proud. I am your creature, fashioned by your grace together with my good works" (St. Augustine, Commentary on the Psalms, 137, 18).

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

First Sunday of Advent - What Difference Does Christ Make?

Today's first reading offers us the promise of the future Messiah. When he comes, "Judah shall be safe and Jerusalem shall dwell secure." All the promises of the future Messiah point to a time of peace, prosperity, justice, and love. As Catholics we believe that Jesus is that long awaited Messiah, and yet we do not see peace, prosperity, or justice. Instead, we find the same wars, poverty, and injustice that ruled the earth prior to and during the time of Jesus. We are left asking, in the words of an old TV commercial: "Where's the love, man?"
The words of Jesus in today's Gospel reading provide us with no answers to our problem. Here again, Jesus paints a gloomy picture of the end times, and yet the description of those times could very well describe just about any historical time period. What is unique about these calamities and signs when we see such things everyday? How can we possibly distinguish the end times from any other time?

When he was a priest in Munster, Germany, Pope Benedict XVI preached a series of sermons on the Advent season to university students there. One of his reflections is relevant to our present meditiation: "What really torments us today, what bothers us much more is the inefficacy of Christianity: after two thousand years of Christian history, we can see nothing that might be a new reality in the world; rather, we find it sunk in the same old horrors, the same despair, and the same hopes as ever. And in our own lives, too, we inevitably experience time and again how Christian reality is powerless against all the other forces that influence us and make demands on us. And if, after our labor and efforts to live on the basis of what is Christian, we draw up the final balance sheet, then often enough the feeling comes over us that the reality has been taken away from us, dissolved, and all that remains in the end is just an appeal to the feeble light of our good will" (What it Means to be Christian, Ignatius, 2006).

The answer lies in the person of Jesus himself. The Messianic promise is fulfilled in the person of Jesus, who found peace in the midst of depravity and violence. The teachings of Jesus were complemented by the example of Jesus, who showed us through his life how to live in the world. It is in imitating Jesus and abandoning ourselves entirely to God that the Messianic promise comes true in our own lives. The promises of the Messianic prophecies and the description of the end times are simultaneous messages that we must appropriate in our own lives and in our own times. That promise is for us now, not just back then, and the warnings about the end times are for us now and not just back then.

Today's second reading brings to light what should be the attitude of the Christian who lives in expectation: "May the Lord make you increase and abound in love for one another and for all, just as we have for you, so as to strengthen our hearts, to be blameless in holiness before our God and Father at the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ...as you received from us how you should conduct yourselves to please God - you do so even more."

Let our prayer for this Advent be that of St. Ambrose: "Of what use is it to me, who am mindful of my sins, if you come, O Lord, and yet do not come into my soul and into my spirit; if you, O Christ, do not live in me, nor speak within me? It is to me that you must come, for me that your coming advent must become a reality. Your second coming, O Lord, will take place at the end of the world; then we shall be able to say: For me the world has been crucified and I for the world. O see to it, Lord, that the end of the world finds me occupied with heaven. Then, wisdom, virtue, and justice, and the redemption will all become truly present for me. O Christ, you indeed died but once for the sins of your people, but with the purpose of ransoming them every day from their sins" (St. Ambrose, Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, 10: 7-8).

Monday, November 16, 2009

Are You a King?

We arrive at the culmination of the liturgical year with the celebration of the Feast of Christ the King. Many people might question the purpse of this feast, since kings aren't rulers of nations any longer. How can modern people understand the meaning of the title if we do not have kings any longer. However, the readings for the day present us with a complete picture of what the Church means in ascribing this title to Jesus, a title that can be understood in any time and place.
The first reading from Daniel is an expectation of a future Messiah. Daniel is writing to a community of Jews oppressed by foreign kings, and they find themselves in this situation due to the unfaithfulness of Israel's kings. Daniel sets his sights on a future king who possesses ultimate power, whose rule is not just for Jews but for all people, and whose rule shall never end. This hope is that of the entire people of Israel in Daniel's time, a desire that grows over the years until the coming of Jesus, in whom Christians see as the fulfillment of this hope.

In the second reading from the book of Revelation, we encounter a description similar to that in Daniel. The author deliberately makes this connection for his audience, who are experiencing the trials of the Roman persecution. The Roman Empire claimed to have ultimate power, universal rule over all peoples, and boasted that their rule would never end. This passage from Revelation is a direct challenge to the claims of the empire and a profession of faith in Jesus, in whom we find our hope and strength against the powers of the world.

The Venerable Bede, the early Church father, points out that in rejecting the earthly kingdom and establishing the kingdom of God on earth as a foretaste of the kingdom to come, Jesus anoints the subjects of his kingdom as priests who must offer themselves as a sacrifice for others just as Christ did for us: "Since the King of Kings and the celestial Priest united us to his own body by offering himself up for us, there is no one of the saints who is spiritually deprived of the office of the priesthood, since everyone is a member of the eternal Priest" (Bede, Explanation of the Apocalypse, 1.6).

The kingship of Christ is something Pilate cannot possibly comprehend, as we see in today's Gospel. The kingdom of Jesus does not belong to this world, it is not about fighting military wars with earthly rulers. Instead, the kingship of Christ is one of truth, and the subjects of Jesus' kingdom are those who belong to the truth. The kingdom of Jesus will indeed face violence and opposition from worldly kingdoms because they are built upon falsehood. The kingdsoms of the world in every age claim to save us from war, poverty, and the like, but those claims are always and everywhere lies designed to enslave human beings. Again, it is only Jesus who can bring salvation and truth to our lives: that is the fundamental message of this feast day. We await the fulness of Jesus' kingdom that exists on earth as a promise of the one for which we pray: thy kingdom come!

Jesus proclaims his kingship right before mounting the cross, the throne from which he reigns. If we wish to be his subjects, we must be crucified as well. Let us close our meditation with a reflection from a famous theologian of the 20th century who offered this thought and prayer for this feast day thus: "We must bear witness to this truth by what we sacrifice and what we venture. We must want to be witnesses to Christ and subjects of his kingdom, and have the courage to accept abasement. Right and truth are not necessarily what seems noble and glorious, what the world will accept and heartily applaud. No, the light shines in the darkness and the darkness has not comprehended it. In us too there is darkness. That shrinking from the light is part of our own heart, and so Jesus the man of sorrows stands before us and says to us: 'Everyone who is of the truth hears my voice.' Without making pronouncements about the Church and her power, without thinking of the Church in terms of party politics, could we not make room in our hearts and say: Disperse the darkness of my heart and allow your truth - which is humility, faithfulness, hoping against hope, blessed truth - to be in me, so that your power may triumph by drawing everything to you, as you hang there, lifted up upon the cross, even my poor heart" (Karl Rahner S.J., Biblical Homilies, "There Stands Truth", Feast of Christ the King 1958).

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

The Great Parousia

As we approach the end of the liturgical year, the Church provides us with readings designed to have us consider a topic we would rather not think about. The end of our lives and the end of the world are not cheerful topics, but they are both realities with which we have to face. The way a person approaches these realities determines their outlook on a great many things in life, as well as their final outcome in the life to come.

The first reading from Daniel and the Gospel reading from Mark present us with a stark picture of the end of time. Unsurpassed distress and great tribulations will define these times. We have to remember that these readings are a specific type of literature to ancient times known as apocalyptic. The purpose of writing apocalyptic was not to instill fear or even to determine the specific time of destruction. Rather, authors use this literary device to encourage their readers to remain faithful to the way of the Lord and to persevere during difficult times. Apocalyptic literature, then, was really a message of hope written for an audience experiencing great trial.

In the case of Daniel, the author of that work was encouraging the Jewish community experiencing persecution at the hand of pagan occupying forces in Israel at the time. Daniel is referring to those specific historical instances and uses them as a backdrop for a larger apocalyptic of cosmic proportions. Those who lead others to justice will be rewarded, while those who committed injustice will finally receive punishment for their crimes.

Similarly, the Gospel of Mark was written during the time of the Roman invasion of Judea. The holy city of Jerusalem was destroyed, and the great Temple was razed. This event caused great distress to the early Christian community which was still intimately tied to their Jewish roots. With such calamitous events occurring, the early Christian community to whom Mark was writing expected Jesus to come very soon. Mark employs apocalyptic to encourage his community in the midst of these trials.

The writers of the New Testament used the Greek word “parousia” to refer to the final coming of Jesus. This term was used to describe the solemn entry of the Emperor into a city or province. He would then be declared the savior of that territory. These triumphal arrivals were usually the occasion for feasting and the beginning of a new calendar. (cf. M. Schmaus, Dogmatic Theology, VII, p. 134) The New Testament writers, then, were making a direct challenge to the political establishment of their time: it is Jesus alone who can bring us victory and peace. Jesus alone is our savior and upon his return will we feast, but not before. We cannot accept a political leader as our savior or a political program as our gospel.

Intimately connected with awaiting the coming of Jesus was the full establishment of the kingdom of God, a kingdom that exists now on earth, but serves as a sign of the one that exists fully in heaven. There, Jesus waits as our high priest, as Paul notes in the second reading, since he has already forgiven our sins. As Pope Paul VI noted, “The kingdom of God, which had its beginnings here on earth in the Church of Christ, is not of this world, whose form is passing, and that its authentic development cannot be measured by the progress of civilization, of science, or of technology. The true growth of the kingdom of God consists in an ever-deepening knowledge of the unfathomable riches of Christ, in ever-stronger hope of eternal blessings, in an ever more fervent response to the love of God, and in an ever more generous acceptance of grace and holiness by men” (Pope Paul VI, Credo of the People of God, 27).

As we await with joy the coming of Jesus and the fulfillment of the kingdom of God, let our prayer be the joyful refrain from the responsorial psalm: “O Lord, my allotted portion and my cup, you it is who hold fast my lot. I set the Lord ever before me; with him at my right hand I shall not be disturbed….You will show me the path to life, fullness of joys in your presence, the delights at your right hand forever.”

Thursday, November 5, 2009

The Royal Priesthood of Christ


"The Lord keeps faith forever,

secures justice for the oppressed,

gives food to the hungry.

The Lord sets captives free."


At first glance, the first reading and the Gospel reading for this Sunday do not reflect the sentiment expressed in the passage from the Responsorial Psalm that accompanies them. The first reading for today's Mass depicts a widow in Zeraphath who is suffering from the severe famine on the land. The woman has only enough materials to make one more meal for herself and her son. Once this food is exhausted, they will not have any other way of obtaining food, and thus they will die like many others did in the famine. Yet the prophet Elijah, a foreigner, comes to her asking for food. Is this not unjust? How could the prophet of God ask for food in the midst of famine, realizing she is a widow with a son and no means to support themselves? Nevertheless, the widow readily provides the prophet with food.

The same thought might occur to us as we read today's Gospel where Jesus praises the widow who gives all she has to the Temple treasury. Surely the Temple treasury has no need of such an insignificant amount. What is more, it is the Temple and the entire institution of Judaism that ought to be supporting the widow in her need. Jesus, in fact, condemns the entire system for their mistreatment of widows and orphans just before we encounter the widow in the Temple. How, then, can she be praised for her offering? Yet, the widow makes her humble offering without complaint.

The answer lies in our second reading for this Sunday. Paul continues to reflect upon the priesthood of Jesus Christ, an office to which every follower of Jesus enters at baptism. A priest is commissioned to offer sacrifice, adn the Christian priesthood imitates the priesthood of Christ, who offered himself for the entire human race. Our priesthood, then, is to offer ourselves for others as Jesus did. As Pope John Paul II reminds us in a sermon he gave on these readings, "Our humble offering may be insignificant in itself, like the oil of the widow of Zarapheth or the coins of the poor widow in the Temple. Yet our offering becomes pleasing in the eyes of God thanks to our union with Jesus" (John Paul II, Homily in Barcelona, November 7, 1982).

Everyday life provides us with endless opportunities to exercise our common priesthood of offering ourselves for others. I remember teaching religion to sixth graders at a Catholic school in Plano, TX years ago. Kids often invite many people to their home for the celebration of their birthday, expecting and receiving presents aplenty. One year there was a student in my class who was turning twelve and he invited every0ne in the class to his party. However, he placed a condition on all those who attended: Do not bring a present for me, but instead bring the amount you would have spent on a present for me and give it to our church's sister parish in Honduras. That one selfless act taught us all a great deal about our faith that year, for in that moment he exercised his royal priesthood and offered himself for others.

The point of the readings for today is to focus our attention on what is really important. There are a great many injustices in the world regardless of what time in history we may be living. No doubt we have an obligation to stand against injustice at every turn, but the Gospel is not meant to pit one class against another, one race against another, one gender against another. The heroes of our readings today are two women of different ethnicity and time period. They did not wallow in self pity or engage in class warfare. They remembered the needs of others before their own needs. These women loved their neighbor as themselves. They were participating in the priesthood of Christ and offered themselves for others.

May our lives imitate their lives and the life of Christ, and may our prayer ever be today's opening prayer: "Almighty Father, strong is your justice and great is your mercy. Protect us in the burdens and challenges of life. Shield our minds from the distortion of pride and enfold our desire with the beauty of truth. Help us to become more aware of your loving design so that we may more willingly give our lives in service to all."

Reinventing our Blog

Our Human Rights Blog will adopt a new outlook. Each week we will post a reflection for the upcoming Sunday readings in the liturgical year. By reflecting on the liturgical cycle instead of the news cycle, we can perhaps discern God's will more clearly as we experience these scripture readings in contrast to all that goes on around us in the world.

Friday, September 11, 2009

What's Love Got to Do With It?

"Make my joy complete by your unanimity, possessing the one love, united in spirit and ideals. Never act out of rivalry or conceit; rather, let all parties think humbly of others as superior to themselves, each of you looking to others' interests rather than his own....In everything you do, act without grumbling, or arguing; prove yourselves innocent and straightforward, children of God beyond reproach in the midst of a twisted and depraved generation - among whom you shine like the stars in the sky while holding fast to the word of life." (Philippians 2: 2-4, 14-16)

In reflecting on this passage from St. Paul, I was reminded of a passage from William Shakespeare's play "A Midsummer Night's Dream". In this scene the king and queen of the fairies - Oberon and Titania - are quarreling, and Titania says this to her husband:


"And thorough this distemperature we see

The seasons alter: hoary-headed frosts

Far in the fresh lap of the crimson rose,

And on old Hiems' thin and icy crown

An odorous chaplet of sweet summer buds

Is, as in mockery, set: the spring, the summer,

The childing autumn, angry winter, change

Their wonted liveries, and the mazed world,

By their increase, now knows not which is which:

And this same progeny of evils comes

From our debate, from our dissension;

We are their parents and original." (Midsummer Night's Dream, Act II, scene i)


In effect, she is saying that the storms of nature and the conflict among humans is the result of the quarrels among the gods. This belief was widespread in the ancient world. Recall from antiquity that in Homer's telling of the Trojan War, the cause of that war was not the abduction of Helen by Paris, but rather the war was caused by the conflict among the gods.


What does all of this have to do with the passage from St. Paul? Paul urges us Christians to live united in love and ideals. We should be setting aside our own ideas and preferences and living for others. This manner of living stands in contrast to the ways of the twisted world in which we find ourselves.


However, let us consider for a moment the vitriolic dissension that exists in the Church today. One has only to check out the blogs in any Catholic publication online to see the level of hate that exists among the faithful of Christ. Could it be that our dissensions are the cause of those that exist in the world? How can we point our finger at the world and preach a message of peace and love when we are hurling insults at one another? Is this the manner of living as a Christian?


These questions should give us pause to reflect: is the world growing more and more violent and pagan because we have become less and less Christian? In the early Church the pagans marveled at the manner in which Christians lived: "See the Christians - how they love one another!" was their exclamation. It was this love that conquered the world. Can the world today make the same exclamation as they see us? If the love among Christians is what led the world to Christ, then it is our lack of love among one another that is driving them away from Christ.


May we rediscover the love of Christ that leads us to unity, peace, and love in our souls and in our communal life of the Church.

Friday, July 31, 2009

Archbishop O'Brien Calls for End to Nuclear Weapons

Drawing from the Church's long-held teaching on the morality of war, a member of the U.S. bishops' Committee on International Justice and Peace called upon attendees ata nuclear deterrence symposium to work to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

Archbishop Edwin F. O'Brien of Baltimore told an audience of 500 people gathered for the military-sponsored symposium in Omaha, NE July 29 that the abolishment of nuclear weapons was an issue of "fundamental moral values that should unite people across national and ideological boundaries."


"Our world and its leaders must stay focused on the destination of a nuclear weapons-free world and on the concrete steps that lead there," he said. "Especially in a world with weapons of mass destruction and at a time when nations...are reportedly seeking to build such weapons, we must pursue a world in which fewer nuclear states have fewer nuclear weapons."


Repeatedly citing the U.S. Bishops 1983 pastoral letter on peace, "The Challenge of Peace: God's Promise and our Response," and statements from three popes on the morality of possessing nuclear weapons, Archbishop O'Brient held out hope that the goal of worldwide nuclear disarmament could be realized.


In an interview prior to his address, Archbishop O'Brien told Catholic News Service that symposium attendees, representing the defense industry, military and academia, seemed to recognize the urgency needed to reduce nuclear weapons stockpiles.


"There's a lot of good will here," said the archbishop, the former head of the U.S. Archdiocese for the Military Services. "They'd like to see results but they realize, as professionals, what the obstacles are.


"They have to be convinced that step by stem this is going to take time, it's going to take perseverance, but that it's worth the effort and a matter of encouraging each other, getting national consensus."


The deterrence symposium, the first sponsored by the U.S. Strategic Command based at Offut Air Force Base south of Omaha, brought together a wide audience concerned about arms control to explore the issues related to the existence of nuclear weapons as part of American military and foreign policy.


Saying in his speech that we was "asked to offer more challenge than comfort" in his presentation, Archbishop O'Brien reminded the gathering of the Fifth Commandment's admonition against killing. He explained that in Catholic teaching all life is considered sacred because every person is created in the image and likeness of God.


A former military chaplain, the archbishop briefly reviewed the church's traditional teaching on just war, developed 16 centuries ago by St. Augustine, which outlines the conditions under which countries can wage war.


The ultimate goal of the Catholic Church, he explained, is a world without hostilities.


"It must be said at the outset that our church supports building international agreements and structures that will make war ever less likely as a means of resolving disputes between nations and peoples,' he said. "Ultimately we must work for a world without war."


He repeated the words of Pope Paul VI in his 1965 address to the United Nations and echoed later by Pope John Paul II: "No more war, war never again."


"The international community must seek ways to make war a relic of humanity's past if humanity is to have a future worthy of human dignity," he said.


He said the "moral path to zero" nuclear weapons will be difficult, but is achievable. The path is marked by signposts, among them the realization that nuclear deterrence produces only "peace of a sort," he said.


"Peace is more than the absence of war," he explained. "It is built painstakingly on the foundation of justice and human rights. Tragically the vast resources devoted to acquiring ever new weapons can rob nations of the resources needed to address the causes of human suffering and conflict."


The archbishop, who served as head of the military archdiocese for 10 years until his appointment to Baltimore in 2007, quoted Pope John Paul in saying that nuclear deterrence - possessing nuclear weapons to prevent other nations from using them - should not be a goal in itself, but only a step on the path to nuclear disarmament.


The ongoing quest for new weapons systems, he said, must be considered from a moral perspective.


"It is not morally acceptable to aim for nuclear superiority instead of sufficiency," Archbishop O

Brien said. "It is not morally legitimate to develop new nuclear weapons for new missions such as to counter non-nuclear threats or to make them smaller and more 'usable' as bunker busters."


The archbishop urged the gathering to support efforts to negotiate new treaties governing nuclear weapons.


He called the early July signing by President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev of a joint understandiung to guide negotiations on reducing strategic warheads before the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty expires later this year an important step.


He also said the Vatican supports the 2010 review conference on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which would continue efforts to stop the spread of nuclear weapons-grade material.


Furthermore, he said, by entering into a new Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, which would end tests of new nuclear weapons, the world's nuclear states can demonstrate that they are "serious about their commitment to a nuclear weapons-free world."


"The moral end is clear: a world free of the threat of nuclear weapons," he said. "This goal should guide our efforts. Every nuclear weapons system and every nuclear weapons policy should be judged by the ultimate goal of protecting human life and dignity and the related goal of ridding the world of these weapons in mutually verifiable ways."


(From Catholic News Service. The full text of the Archbishop's comments can be found at www.usccb.org/sdwp/international/nuclearzero.shtml



Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Togo Set to Repeal Capital Punishment

ROME, MAY 26, 2009 (Zenit.org).-

Togo will soon be the latest country to abolish the death penalty, its minister of justice affirmed at a congress on capital punishment in Rome.The announcement was made Monday at the IV International Congress of Justice Ministers on Monday, hosted by the Community Sant'Egidio and attended by ministers, government officials and policy advisers from around the world.The congress was titled "From the Moratorium to the Abolition of Capital Punishment: No Justice Without Life."A press release from the community reported that Kokou Biossey Koné, Togo's justice minister, affirmed that the West African country's decision to abolish the death penalty came about due to the friendship that unites his country with Sant'Egidio.

Although Togo proposed the abolishment last December, the legislation is set to pass this week.Koné said the Sant'Egidio community had been in close contact with the government about this decision for over a few years.ProgressRepresentatives from 23 countries took part in the congress in Rome, which brought together parties on both sides of the issue of capital punishment. The community's president, Marco Impagliazzo, affirmed that this congress shows that the abolition of the death penalty represents a "new moral level" that will be even more difficult to ignore in the international scope.He noted that these congresses have helped many countries understand the necessary steps in order to move from maintaining capital punishment to abolishing it.

At the beginning of the 20th century only three countries have abolished the death penalty for all crimes. Today, they are 93.Impagliazzo noted that Europe is the "first continent in the world without the death penalty. Today, no country can join the European Union if the death penalty is not abolished from its legal system."In Africa, he said that progress is being made, "where more and more countries are abolishing the death penalty." He noted the abolishment of capital punishment in Rwanda, Gabon, Burundi and Togo.The Sant'Egidio president said that the majority of Asian countries maintain the death penalty, as well as most states in the United States.Impagliazzo added, however, the progress being made in the United States, noting that New Mexico abolished capital punishment in March.New Jersey abolished the death penalty two years ago, and similar laws are under discussion in Nebraska, New Hampshire, Connecticut and Montana.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Catholic Diocese Head Joins Protest

Reported by: Larry Seward Email: seward@nbcactionnews.com Last Update: 9:39 pm

Related Links
Missouri Execution Draws Protestors to the Plaza
Missouri Prepares for 1st Execution Since 2005

KANSAS CITY, Mo. – The head of the Catholic Diocese of Kansas City and St. Joseph joined death penalty protesters voicing opposition to the scheduled execution of Dennis Skillicorn.“We have to figure out a way to protect society short of taking another life,” said Bishop Robert Finn.Dennis Skillicorn faced the death penalty for his role in the 1994 murder of Richard Drummond, a good Samaritan, who, at the time, was trying to help fix his attackers’ car in Excelsior Springs.For some of the protesters gathered on the Plaza Tuesday night, their demonstration was not just about Skillicorn. It was personal.“My son is on death row, Michael Anthony Taylor,” said Linda Taylor.20 years ago, Michael Taylor kidnapped, raped and killed Ann Harrison, 14. A court stayed Taylor’s scheduled execution two years ago. His mom acknowledges the terrible nature of Michael’s crimes. However, she refuses to accept lethal injection as fair and just punishment.“My thing is why do we kill people who kill people,” Taylor asked. “Is it to show killing is wrong? That’s wrong. Two wrongs don’t make a right.”“The real goal is to protect the legitimate well-being of people,” said Bishop Finn.Finn sympathizes with Drummond’s family. Finn said Drummond was an example to members of the Christian faith. Finn does not doubt Skillicorn did wrong. However, Finn will never support the death penalty for any reason.“We don’t correct that by taking his life,” Bishop Finn said. “Lock him up. Let him work on rehabilitation. There are some signs that he experienced some inner conversion. That’s good. Thanks be to God for that.”

Monday, May 18, 2009

“Give Me Liberty or…?”

The New Hampshire state motto is “Give me liberty or give me death” – a phrase that often becomes the subject of libertarian essays on the importance of liberty and the evils of government. This conversation even penetrates the Church, and various people hold a wide array of positions on the question of liberty and government. What, then, is the Catholic position on the matter?

Proponents of liberty argue that human beings should be able to do for themselves, and that the purpose of government is to assist the family and the individual in their pursuit of happiness by defending their freedom and leading the person and family to self-sufficiency. These arguments depend upon the principle of subsidiarity, something that is foundational in Catholic social teaching. Subsidiarity, moreover, forms the basis of our American federal system where larger entities help the smaller entities to be more self-sufficient.

However, what happens when: 1 – a person becomes unable to be self-sufficient and needs the assistance of others, or 2 – when liberty becomes abused and threatens the social order? Proponents of liberty seem to suggest that liberty is an end in itself, and that when liberty is attained all is well. Yet, Alexander Hamilton pointed out that if men were angels there would be no need for government. We are not angels. Liberty is not an end, but rather a means to an end. As Pope John Paul II taught, the Catholic tradition argues that freedom is for service of God and others. What is more, government is necessary not only to ensure our freedom, but also to assist the individual when he or she is unable to help themselves.

The Catholic tradition also holds a revered place for solidarity, a virtue and a duty of the Christian life that requires us to care for the needs of others, to defend the common good, and to transcend our selfish nature. In fact, the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church speaks far more about solidarity than subsidiarity. However, it must be pointed out that solidarity is primarily a virtue of the person and society to care for others. It still respects subsidiarity when required to do so. Still, a notion of liberty that would have us ignore the needs of the person who is no longer self-sufficient or the plight of those who are threatened with the excesses of liberty is not an authentic notion of liberty.

Thus, the Catholic position on the role of liberty and government is a middle position. The Church respects liberty but does not see it as an end in itself. Rather, liberty exists to serve God and others through the virtue of solidarity. At the same time, the Church respects the role of government in helping those who cannot help themselves and defending the rights of others while at the same time rejecting any notion of the state as becoming the provider of all goods and services. So, yes – give us liberty, but also a generous heart to use it for God and others.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Pope Affirms Love is the Key to Knowledge of God

Urges Spiritual Battle Against Greed to Solve Economic Crisis

VATICAN CITY, APRIL 22, 2009 (Zenit.org).- Benedict XVI is affirming the words of a eighth century writer, who noted that although intellectual study can help, only when we love God can we truly know him.
The Pope said this today at the general audience in St. Peter's Square, in which he continued a catechesis series about great writers of the Church in the Middle Ages, speaking today about the monk and abbot, Ambrose Autpert.
He explained, "The Church lives in people and whoever wants to get to know the Church, to understand its mystery, must consider the people who have lived and who continue to live its message, its mystery."
The Pontiff noted that Autpert lived in an age when "strong political tensions" influenced life inside the monasteries, motivating him to write with the intention of helping his monks live virtuously. The abbot "intended to train the monks specifically on how to address the spiritual battle on a daily basis."
In a treatise on the conflict between vice and virtue, the Holy Father said, "He presents 24 pairs of combatants in a kind of juxtaposition: each vice tries to persuade the soul with subtle reasoning, while the respective virtues refute such insinuations preferably using the words of Scripture."
Benedict XVI pointed out in particular the monk's description of greed and the corresponding virtue of contempt of the world. He explained: "This contempt of the world is not a contempt of creation, beauty and goodness of creation and the Creator, but a contempt of the false vision of the world presented and insinuated to us by our own greed.
"This greed affirms that the value of 'having' is the supreme value of our being, of our living in the world and our image of ourselves as important. And so greed falsifies the creation of the world and destroys the world."
He observed that like St. Paul, Autpert sees greed as the root of all evil. The monk notes that this vice influences the rich and powerful as well as the souls of his monks.
The Pope added: "I offer this reflection, which, in light of this global economic crisis, is revealed in all its relevance. We see that from this very root of greed this crisis is born.
"Ambrose foresaw the objection that the rich and powerful would raise, saying: but we are not monks, these ascetic standards don't apply to us. And he answers: 'It is true what you say, but also for you, in your own way and to the best of your ability, the hard and narrow way applies to you, because the Lord has proposed only two doors and two ways -- the narrow gate and the wide, the hard and comfortable; he did not indicate a third door or a third way.'"
The Pontiff affirmed that even rich people must "fight against greed, against the desire to possess, to appear, against the false notion of freedom as the right to dispose of everything according to one's own will," and they must also "find the authentic path of truth, of love and in this way the path of moral rectitude."
The abbot wrote that the piety that frees the "soul from attachment to earthly and transient pleasures" should be "united with the deep study of the sacred sciences, especially the meditation of Sacred Scripture."
The Holy Father noted the example of Autpert, who emphasized that "every theological search for truth relies on love," and prayed to God, "When you are scrutinized intellectually by us, you're not discovered as you truly are; it's only when you are loved that we reach you."
Benedict XVI continued: "Autpert understood that with mere theological research God can not be known as he really is. Only love can reach him. Let us listen to this message and ask the Lord to help us live the mystery of the Church today, in this our time."

Saturday, April 4, 2009

One Man's Ambivalent Retreat from His Racist Past

Here is a story about why we should love our enemies and reject the appeal to capital punishment. "As I live, says the Lord, I swear I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather in the wicked man's conversion" (Ezekiel 33: 11)


__________________________________________
By HELEN O'NEILL, AP Special Correspondent Helen O'neill, Ap Special Correspondent – Sat Apr 4, 5:44 pm ET
ROCK HILL, S.C. – Elwin Hope Wilson leans back in his recliner, a sad, sickly man haunted by time.
Antique clocks, at least a hundred of them, fill his neat ranch home on Tillman Street. Grandfather clocks, mantel clocks, cuckoos and Westministers, all ticking, chiming and clanging in an hourly cacophony that measures the passing days.
Why clocks? his wife Judy has often asked during their 49 years together.
He shrugs and offers no answer.
Wilson doesn't have answers for much of how he has lived his life — not for all the black people he beat up, not for all the venom he spewed, not for all the time wasted in hate.
Now 72 and ailing, his body swollen by diabetes, his eyes degenerating, Wilson is spending as many hours pondering his past as he is his mortality.
The former Ku Klux Klan supporter says he wants to atone for the cross burnings on Hollis Lake Road. He wants to apologize for hanging a black doll in a noose at the end of his drive, for flinging cantaloupes at black men walking down Main Street, for hurling a jack handle at the black kid jiggling the soda machine in his father's service station, for brutally beating a 21-year-old seminary student at the bus station in 1961.
In the final chapter of his life, Wilson is seeking forgiveness. The burly clock collector wants to be saved before he hears his last chime.
And so Wilson has spent recent months apologizing to "the people I had trouble with." He has embraced black men his own age, at the same lunch counter where once they were denied service and hauled off to jail as mobs of white youths, Wilson among them, threw insults and eggs and fists.
Wilson has carried his apology into black churches where he has unburdened it in prayer.
And he has taken it to Washington, to the office of Congressman John Lewis of Atlanta, the civil rights leader whose face Wilson smashed at the Greyhound bus station during the famed Freedom Rides 48 years ago.
The apologies have won headlines and praise. Letters have poured in, lauding Wilson's courage. Strangers, black and white, have hailed him as a hero.
But Wilson doesn't feel like a hero. He feels confused. He cannot fully answer the lingering questions, the doubts. Where did all the hate come from? And where did it go?
And the question he gets asked most often: Why now?
"All I can say is that it has bothered me for years, all the bad stuff I've done," Wilson says, speaking slowly and deliberately. "And I found out there is no way I could be saved and get to heaven and still not like blacks."
If you do get to heaven, his wife points out, they're going to be there with you.
___
All his life, Wilson has brandished his meanness like a badge of honor. To mess with Elwin Wilson, he says, meant a fist in your face. Especially if you happened to be black.
"I wasn't ever scared of no one, or nothing," says Wilson, still a tall, strapping man despite his illness.
"You were scared of the ghost of that black man you saw rocking in the chair," his wife reminds him, describing the nightmare several years ago when he furiously beat his fists into thin air.
Wilson narrows his eyes and scowls at her.
Wilson has a pale face, thin white hair and small pursed lips that rarely smile. Even recent fame hasn't encouraged him to be sociable. He doesn't care what people think of him and bluntly declares, "I might like you one day and not the next."
Wilson's 49-year-old son, Chris, describes his deep embarrassment growing up with a father who was always bracing for a confrontation. He would holler at blacks in restaurants, sneer at them in public, brazenly use the N-word in front of Chris' teen friends.
"He was real hard to live with," Chris Wilson says.
The recent apologies have stunned the son as much as anyone, inspiring a genuine pride in his father he never felt before.
For his part, Wilson seems unsure where his racism originated. It certainly wasn't inherited, he says. He was an only child; his parents treated everyone equally, though Wilson says his father, who owned several gas stations in town, once told him that his grandfather and grandfather's brothers had been involved with the Klan.
"I guess it was just the crowd I ran with," Wilson says with a shrug. "It was sport."
Sport was running moonshine with the likes of Junior Johnson, the famed NASCAR driver who honed his skills outracing police on the back roads of Wilkes County, N.C. Sport was gunning his 1955 Chevrolet — his "little red wagon" — in drag races all over the state.
Sport was marching down Main Street behind hooded members of the KKK. And taunting the young black students who, week after week, walked silently to the segregated lunch counters of Woolworth's and McCrory's only to get arrested by police.
Sport was drunkenly releasing flying squirrels in the bedroom where his young wife slept. Or dragging her to a black speakeasy after a day of catfishing, to show off his skills dancing shag.
"He could dance real well," she says. "But I was scared to death."
Sport was heckling the black protesters on Main Street as they solemnly held placards in front of the segregated stores. "Segregation, America's shame," the handwritten signs read. "No color line in Heaven."
And sport was lying in wait for a certain bus to pull into the Greyhound depot on May 9, 1961. Freedom Riders, they were called, black and white students traveling through the South, testing the new desegregation laws at bus station restaurants and restrooms.
Lewis described what happened in his autobiography, "Walking with the Wind: A Memoir of the Movement."
"I approached the 'WHITE' waiting room in the Rock Hill Greyhound Terminal, I noticed a large number of young white guys hanging around the pinball machines in the lobby. Two of these guys were leaning by the doorjamb to the waiting room. They wore leather jackets, had those ducktail haircuts and were each smoking a cigarette.
"Other side, nigger," one of the two said, stepping in my way as I began to walk through the door. He pointed to a door down the way with a sign that said 'COLORED.'... The next thing I knew, a fist smashed the right side of my head. Then another hit me square in the face. As I fell to the floor I could feel feet kicking me hard in the sides. I could taste blood in my mouth."
Wilson winces as he reads the passage from an autographed copy of the book that Lewis gave him. "I don't ever remember kicking him," he says. "But I know he got my fist."
For years Wilson didn't know the identity of the man he had beaten, though he says that over time, guilt began weighing heavy on his heart.
It was only recently, he says, that things became clear.
___
Willie McCleod. Robert McCullough. John Gaines. W.T. "Dub" Massey. Thomas Gaither. Clarence Graham. James Wells. David Williamson Jr. Mack Workman.
These are the men whom Wilson taunted all those years ago. The men to whom he has been apologizing in recent months, asking their forgiveness and blessing.
Their names are engraved on the stools at the counter of the Old Town Bistro on Main Street. The former McCrory's is now a family-run restaurant that bustles with hospitality and charm. Waitresses greet regulars by name and pour endless cups of coffee for patrons, black and white.
And yet it is impossible to walk in and not feel transported in time.
Sepia-toned photographs hang on the walls, images of young black men at this very counter, where "temporarily closed" signs went up as soon as they sat down.
Outside, a historic plaque marks the spot where nine Friendship Junior College students took an extraordinary stand on Jan. 31, 1961, choosing jail rather than bail after being arrested for ordering hamburgers and sodas. Convicted of trespassing and breach of peace, the students endured a month's hard labor in a chain gang rather than allow civil rights groups to pay $100 each for their release. The case of the "Friendship Nine" drew national headlines and soon the policy of "jail, no bail" was being emulated all over the South.
Today, the eight surviving members are hailed as celebrities every time they walk in the door. "They're our history," says a young white waitress one recent afternoon as she serves coffee to Massey and McCleod. She tells them it's on the house.
The men, now in their 60s, smile as they recall those heady days — how young and foolish they were, how filled with conviction and pride. They describe weeks of nonviolent training with the Congress of Racial Equality, a Gandhi-inspired civil rights organization that taught them not to respond when men like Wilson dumped soda on their heads, or stubbed lit cigarettes into their skin, or flung ammonia at the counter.
And they describe the swirl of emotions they feel, even now, when they return to this place. There is joy and sadness, says McCleod, who owns a plumbing and septic business. Joy at what they accomplished. Sadness that there was such hate.
Says Massey, a retired minister who works with special education students: "There is always a small part of me goes back to that day."
The men say they never thought about their tormentors as individuals with real lives and real names. They forgave them a long time ago.
So it has been strange and somewhat discomforting to suddenly be confronted by a real name, a real man, a white bigot who wants to repent.
An unease creeps into their conversation when it turns to the subject of apologies. There have been several in recent years — when Mayor Doug Echols officially apologized to Lewis during the congressman's January 2008 return to Rock Hill, when the York County Council apologized to the Friendship Nine at the dedication of the plaque. And now Elwin Wilson.
His apology, offered in the restaurant in January, was facilitated by the local newspaper, The Herald, which Wilson called after reading an article about the Friendship Nine.
Not all the men agreed to meet with him. Privately, some questioned his motives, his timing, his sincerity.
David Williamson, for one, had no qualms. He understands a man wanting to put his affairs in order before meeting his maker. "I think it is a testament to how the world has changed and how hearts have changed," Williamson says.
McCleod went too, saying it was not for him to judge another man's heart. Massey demurred, saying he couldn't take time off work.
It was at the January meeting that Wilson finally discovered that the student he had beaten at the bus station had gone on to become a congressman — a discovery that eventually led to his well-publicized apology to Lewis in Washington.
Mack Workman, another member of the Friendship Nine who now lives in New York, watched the apology on television, listened as the congressman praised Wilson's "raw courage." And yet Workman felt dissatisfied.
"In the back of my mind I just keep thinking, `Why now?'"
___
Wilson says he gave up drinking in 1976. He is less sure of when he gave up hating blacks.
"By the time I went to college I had dropped all that jumping on them," he says. "I still didn't want to marry one or anything like that."
That was in the 1970s when Wilson was in his late 30s. Over the years, he had drifted through different jobs — construction foreman, welder, millwright. He had joined the Air Force where, in Biloxi, Miss, he began associating with blacks as equals for the first time. And he had returned to Rock Hill, where he enrolled in the Friendship Junior College under the GI bill.
He saw no irony in the fact that the college was black. It was convenient, he says. And times had changed.
And yet there was a hardness in Wilson's heart that hadn't changed — a hate that boiled over frequently, especially when it came to race.
In the 1980s, when the local cemetery began burying blacks alongside whites, Wilson became so incensed he threatened to disinter the bodies of his parents. When a black family bought a house in the neighborhood around the same time, Wilson accosted the real estate agent and demanded that the sale be rescinded.
He yelled racial insults whenever his grandson, Christopher, whom he raised, talked on the phone to his black wrestling buddy. When a garden ornament — a stone statue of a black boy in straw hat — was vandalized in Wilson's front yard, he strung up a black doll with a noose around its neck, and threatened to use an AK-47 against a neighbor who complained.
As late as 1999, when his Baptist pastor began encouraging more black participation, Wilson got so upset he left the church.
Wilson says now he is ashamed of his behavior. He has since apologized to his grandson and to the neighbor he threatened. And he has been surprised by how liberated the apologies have made him feel. People don't understand the burden of carrying all that hate, he says.
The burden only grew as Wilson got older and began to put his affairs in order, buying burial plots for himself and Judy, dolefully pondering the afterlife.
"I'm going to hell," he told Clarence Bradley one day in January, when, feeling poorly after yet another doctor visit, he stopped by his friend's auto paint and body shop on Eastview Road. The two have long shared an interest in antiques and cars.
Slumped on the sofa, surrounded by mementoes from the 1950s — a vintage soda machine with bottles of Coca Cola and Orange Crush, dusty photographs of old cars and old times — Bradley had never seen his friend so sick or so low.
Bradley is a solidly built man of 62 with a serious manner and firm opinions about the urgent need for more people to invite the Lord into their lives.
"If you truly ask forgiveness and you mean it in your heart, you can be saved," he told Wilson. "You just have to let the Lord guide you."
They talked about it some more. Another friend, a part-time preacher, walked in. For the next five minutes the three men bowed their heads in prayer.
"Only God and Elwin know what's in his heart," Bradley says. "But I can tell you something in that man changed that day."
Wilson says he felt it too, a profound sense of peace, a feeling he was no longer doomed.
"It's not like I stopped cussing or anything," he says. "But I didn't feel the same hate."
A week later, Wilson spent the day watching the inauguration of the nation's first black president. He saw the local newspaper article about the Friendship Nine as they watched too. He knew exactly what to do.
___
Wilson's two-car garage is an ode to another era, stacked with old soda and pinball machines, vintage phones, an old gas pump, trophies from his drag-racing victories, photos of his father's gas stations in the 1950s.
Nailed to one wall is the "colored" sign that once hung over the restroom in the bus station. For years Wilson thought about selling it, or even donating it to a museum. Lately, he decided he must keep it. He needs to look at it now and then, he says, "to remind me what I did wrong."
In his living room is another reminder, a framed newspaper photograph from 1961. It shows a stylishly dressed black man wiping egg off his hat, surrounded by a bunch of sneering white youths. The muscular young man who threw the egg smirks for the camera.
"That was me," Wilson says, staring intently at the 48-year-old image, trying to remember the specifics of the day. He can't. There were so many like it.
"I am a different man now," he says.
He leafs through some of the recent letters that have poured into his mailbox and starts reading them aloud.
"When I read about your courageous apology, I was moved to tears," wrote a woman from North Carolina. "Your action in seeking forgiveness and the others in forgiving you is now a blessing for others."
"I am African-American and I just want to tell you how grateful I am to hear your story and to know that there are heroes like you in the world," wrote a woman from California. "Your apology touched my heart."
Not everyone was so moved. Wilson says he received one threatening phone call from a man accusing him of betraying the KKK. Another accused him of being a liar. His son, who accompanied Wilson to Washington, still receives racist text messages.
"It hasn't been easy," Wilson says with a sigh.
On this chilly Wednesday evening Wilson had been scheduled to speak at a local black church. But he has been feeling ill all day, so he calls the pastor at the last minute to say he can't make it. His health has to come first, he explains.
Putting down the phone, Wilson complains about being worn out by all the demands. He never thought one man's apology could trigger so much interest, so many invitations and calls. He has been asked to attend several events with Lewis, including one in Selma, Ala., but he is not sure if he will go. He has to consider his safety.
Wilson finishes his liver and okra and turns on his flat-screen television. He says he's tired of talking about the past. He just wants to watch his favorite true-crime show, "Nancy Grace," and catch the latest on the Florida toddler whose mother has been charged with her murder.
His wife says he is obsessed with the case. He follows each twist and turn, every day.
Wilson says he feels like crying when he thinks about the little girl and her terrible fate. "There's just so much bad in the world," he says, shaking his head. "Makes you wonder where it all comes from."
It's 8 p.m. Outside, Wilson's German shepherd, Heidi, barks into the night. Inside, a hundred clocks note the hour, chiming and clanging and vibrating through the house, drowning out the television as they mark the passing of time.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Bishop Finn's Statement on the Death Penalty

Bishops Column
April 3, 2009

Good Friday and a Moratorium on the Death Penalty

As we approach Palm Sunday and the celebrations of Holy Week our reflections are focused on the Passion, suffering and death of Our Lord.

The gift of our redemption is accomplished – once for all – in the death of Jesus Christ who took our sins upon Himself and unjustly went through a brutal execution. In dying for our sins, He carries us through death to new life.

For the last two and a half years I have had the privilege of serving as Chairman of the United States Bishops’ Task Force for the Life and Dignity of the Human Person. One of the specific objectives that we have recommended to the bishops – as a priority – is to use this fundamental belief about the inalienable life and dignity of the human person as a unifying theme for all our efforts in defense of human life at all moments – from its inception through natural death.

So dignified and worthy of reverence is the human person that Jesus Christ determined, while we were still sinners, to lay down His life for us, that we may have life. Each human person has infinite value despite our failures and even our most horrible sins.

Today I wish to offer a plea for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty in Missouri. I know various other leaders and organizations have made similar appeals. Traditionally the U.S. Bishops have used the occasion of the commemoration of Jesus, execution on Good Friday as the moment to seek the grace of this clemency. I have joined the Missouri Bishops on more than one occasion in requesting this of our State government, and I wish to renew my petition for this relief.

Missouri has the opportunity to accomplish something very important: to pass a moratorium bill that would halt executions in our state for three years and establish a commission to study the practice of capital punishment in our state. This commission would report to the legislature, governor, attorney general, and the State Supreme Court. Currently, the Senate is considering only a study commission, while the Assembly is still considering a full moratorium bill. I urge our representatives in the Missouri Legislature to support this legislation for a full moratorium along with the study commission.

What are some of the reasons for us to do away with this ultimate and irreversible act of human justice?

The first reason is defined in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition, number 2267.

“Assuming that the guilty party's identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor.
If, however, non-lethal means are sufficient to defend and protect people's safety from the aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and more in conformity to the dignity of the human person.
Today, in fact, as a consequence of the possibilities which the state has for effectively preventing crime, by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm - without definitely taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself - the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity ‘are very rare, if not practically nonexistent.’”
The distinctions drawn here are valid and significant. Society may – indeed must – defend itself. But because we can do so without recourse to execution, we ought to do so through non-lethal means. The just use of Capital Punishment is not an intrinsic evil (as are abortion and euthanasia, which can never be justified). But the use of the Death Penalty is a practical moral evil if we can assure the common good without resorting to it.

A secondary, but important reason why we should immediately stop executions is the ample evidence of its occasional mistaken application. It has been shown that sometimes persons on death row are not guilty of capital offenses. We ought not to proceed with the business of State-sponsored execution if it remains a possibility that we may make a fatal miscarriage of justice.

The dignity and value of every human life is sorely offended when violent men and women take the lives of innocent victims. The supreme loss of the life of a victim, and the inestimable hurt of family and loved ones who experience that loss in a continuing way, is perhaps the most difficult element to reconcile in our consideration of the repeal of the death penalty. For this I have no facile response. We know well that the execution of a rightly-convicted offender cannot bring back the life of a loved one unjustly taken from us.

As we approach in faith the events of our redemption in Christ, which will reach a certain climax in Christ’s saving death on the first Good Friday, I pray that the horrific image and live-giving power of Christ’s death will help us see the value of letting this extraordinary practice fade into our history. May God give us some peace in seeking a different path to justice.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Many of our parishes are conducting a postcard campaign to contact our State legislators urging them to support the moratorium legislation. If you would like to participate in the postcard campaign, please contact Jude Huntz, director of the Human Rights Office, at 816-756-1858 ext. 534 or huntz@diocesekcsj.org You can find the contact information for your representatives on our website http://www.diocese-kcsj.org/content/offices_and_agencies/human_rights/advocacy/

Sunday, March 22, 2009

The Gospel and Social Justice

All four Gospel accounts have startling teachings and deeds of Jesus that relate to social justice. Many people who already reject the Church’s social teachings ignore these Gospel accounts, preferring to see a figurative sense for these passages – i.e. Matt. 25 – rather than focus on the obvious literal sense, which is the foundation of all other senses of scripture. One fact that cannot be ignored is that all four Gospels begin the public life of Jesus with a lesson on social justice.

The Gospel of Matthew has Jesus’ public ministry begin with the Sermon on the Mount. Here, Jesus teaches from a mountain top about the essential characteristics of being a disciple. The beatitudes exhort us to hunger and thirst for justice, to be merciful, to be peacemakers, and to accept persecution for the sake of justice (Matt. 5: 6, 7. 9, 10). As Jesus continues to preach this sermon, he exhorts us to forgive our enemies and to love them (Matt 5: 38-48), to avoid judging others (Matt 7: 1-5), and to follow the golden rule (Matt 7: 12). These teachings stand in stark contrast to the prevailing teachings of the day, and Jesus offers them upon a mountain in Galilee where rebels would often meet to plan attacks on the Roman soldiers who occupied the region. These teachings take on a greater prominence, then, for we are exhorted to work tirelessly for justice, but in a peaceful way.

The Gospel of Mark has Jesus’ public ministry begin with Jesus teaching in a synagogue on the Sabbath. The audience was amazed as they taught as one having authority and not as the prevailing teachers of the day. What is more, Jesus performs a miracle in their midst – he drives out a demon from a man (cf. Mark 1: 21-28). This action stood in stark violation of the Sabbath where work could not be performed. Yet, Jesus performs this action boldly in the midst of the all in the synagogue to make a point: worship is pointless if it is not mission oriented. True worship leads to acts of justice, and acts of justice lead to true worship.

Luke’s Gospel also begins Jesus’ public life in a synagogue, and the synagogue is located in Jesus’ home town of Nazareth. Jesus gets up to read from the scroll of Isaiah the prophet, and he chooses this passage: “The spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring glad tidings to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free, and to proclaim a year acceptable to the Lord” (cf. Luke 4: 16-30). Jesus then proclaims that this scripture is fulfilled in him. The people can’t accept this teaching, largely because they have focused so much on opposition to Rome that they have neglected the precepts of the law that relate to care and concern for the poor. Jesus uses the prophetic tradition to call the people to repentance on this point of social justice. Again, the lesson here in Luke is the same as that of Mark: true worship should lead to good deeds, and good deeds should lead to true worship.

John’s Gospel begins with two important events: the wedding feast at Cana and the cleansing of the Temple (cf. John 2). While the miracle at Cana has many figurative images at work here, the literal meaning is also important: Jesus cares for those who are without, and he provides for their basic needs. John then changes the placement of the cleansing of the Temple from the synoptic Gospels, who place this event at the end of Jesus’ ministry. John’s point in this rearrangement is the same as the synoptic accounts in their accounts of Jesus’ public ministry: social justice is at the heart of the Gospel. Jesus condemns the entire system of money changing because it cheated the poor and deprived God of true worship. Again, worship and good deeds go hand in hand.

Saturday, March 7, 2009

St. Paul and the Death Penalty

This year we have been celebrating the Year of St. Paul. While a great many people have focused on the teachings of St. Paul on a great many topics, there has been little said about Paul's conversion and what it meant for the early Church.

We first encounter Paul in Acts 7: 58 when the people who stoned Stephen to death laid their cloaks at the foot of Saul, who was apparently responsible for the death. Acts then records that "Saul was trying to destroy the church; entering house after house and dragging out men and women he handed them over for imprisonment" (Acts 8: 3). Without a doubt there is widespread notoriety within the Christian community about the identity of Saul. The early Christians would have feared him and avoided his presence as much as possible. In fact, Ananias probaby represents the attitude of the early church upon hearing of Saul's conversion. God asks Ananias to accept Saul, but he replies, "Lord, I have heard from many sources about this man, what evil things he has done to your holy ones in Jerusalem. And here he has authority from the chief priests to imprison all who call upon your name" (Acts 9: 13-14).


How many of us would be willing to accept such a person into the Church?


When we look at the issue of the death penalty, I believe this aspect of Paul's life must be taken into consideration. In the book of Ezekiel we read, "As I live, says the Lord, I swear I take no pleasure in the death of the sinner, but rather in the sinful man's conversion" (Ezek. 33: 11). What profound joy did God experience, then, in the conversion of Paul! It must be remembered that the Jewish authorities had no power to put anyone to death, as the Romans had that power. Consequently, the death of Stephen and others were acts of vigilantees who took the law into their own hands. These vigilantees were, in effect, murderers. Yet, God converts the most famous among them and asks us to accept him. Today, he is one of our most revered saints.


What, then, can we learn from this lesson regarding our present day practice of capital punishment?


While the Church acknowledges that the state has the right to execute a person if that is the only means available to protect society, there is also the obligation of the care of souls that the Church has received from the Lord. While a serious offender must be punished and kept apart from others in order to protect society, that offender does not lose his or her complete right to the common good. What is more, they have an eternal destiny that must be taken into consideration.


Perhaps in this year of St. Paul God is asking us to consider anew our commitment to the care of every soul. Do we really have this care for every person's destiny, or only for some? Should we not allow the offender to live and provide him or her every opportunity to repent, convert, and find salvation?


May St. Paul intercede for us, that we may have the grace to imitate the early Church in their acceptance of Paul.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Solidarity

The Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church defines solidarity as a moral virtue that commits us more surely to the common good of others. While the term 'solidarity' is relatively new, the concept itself is ancient, one that finds its full development in the teaching and example of Jesus. Since solidarity is connected to love for our neighbor, we will trace the teachings of Jesus on this theme, and see an ever gradual development of solidarity to which Jesus calls us.

The commandments of the old law were summed up in two simple commandments: you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, all your mind, and all your strength; and love your neighbor as yourself. We are to love our neighbor as we love ourselves, meaning that whatever we would give to ourselves we should also give to our neighbor. This teaching is a basic one of justice, and is connected to the concept of the universal destination of goods. Here is Jesus' first teaching on solidarity - love based on justice.


Yet, this command has a certain egoism connected to it. In thinking of our neighbor we are thinking of ourselves in relation to our neighbor. Thus, Jesus then calls us to the next level. When the lawyer asks Jesus, "Who is my neighbor?" Jesus proceeds to give us the parable of the Good Samaritan in an attempt to answer that question. The answer is that everyone is our neighbor, including our enemies. Jesus himself commanded us to love our enemies and to do good to those who hate us. It is easy to love those who love us, and to see ourselves in them. It is a much harder thing to see our enemy as a neighbor and to see ourselves in their place. That, however, is the next step on the way to solidarity: the circle is expanded to include everyone, including our enemies.


We are still, however, on the level of seeing ourselves in our neighbor, which carries with it the possibility of egoism. Jesus then takes us to the next level of solidarity: to see Jesus in each and every person. In the only teaching on the last judgment, Jesus gives us the criteria by which we are to be judged: by the way we treat others are we to be treated by God. Here, however, Jesus gives us a new criteria: "As often as you did it to one of these least ones, you did it to me." Now, we no longer look to find ourselves in our neighbor, but to see Jesus in him or her. That is a new step, one that takes us away from thinking about ourselves and moves us toward thinking about Jesus who is in each and every person created in the image and likeness of God. Solidarity now grows ever deeper.


However, there is still one final step on the way to a complete notion of solidarity. In the Gospel of John, Jesus gives us the new commandment: "Love one another as I have loved you." We are now commanded to love others in the way that Jesus himself loved us - in a divine way, to the point of living and dying for others. We are now no longer ourselves, but we are now Christ. Our neighbor, who was once identified with ourselves and then with Jesus, is still those things, but now we are the ones who change. We now become Christ and no longer ourselves. It is only then that we achieve true solidarity - when we lose our own identity and become Christ himself.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

The Job Crisis

The big news last week was the fact that Herm Edwards lost his job as head coach of the Kansas City Chiefs, followed by the buzz and excitement that he will be replaced by Mike Shannahan, who was fired as coach of the Denver Broncos. Last year, the Kansas City School District fired Anthony Amato, who had served as superintendant for just one year, after having been fired from holding the same position in New Orleans. In that same time Sprint fired its CEO, and he later became chancellor of the University of Missouri. And finally, in the news today we see that a gentlemen who was fired from H&R Block for overseeing their subprime loan division is now working for the IRS.

Do you see a pattern here? In the world of the rich, you can be as incompetent as you want to be, and you'll still be able to find a high paying job. These sorts of professions do a pretty good job of recycling the trash and rewarding failure. However, if you are in a lower income bracket, you are afforded no such grace. When a lower class person is fired, they are in serious trouble. They are likely to lose their home to foreclosure. They are likely to lose their health insurance for themselves and their family. They are likely to require assistance from the government or other agencies. In short, when the poor lose their jobs it is a more permanent reality for them.

All of what is said above is to call attention to another layer of inequality in our society. I'm not calling for accepting failure across the board, nor am I saying that we not give people a second chance. What I am saying is that the opportunity for a second chance should apply to all fairly. I am also saying that there are different degrees of failure. If a poor person makes a mistake at their job, the economic result for the company or customer is relatively small. However, when CEO's, superintendants of school districts, and the like fail, it results in catastrophic economic consequences that affect the lives of many people and sometimes the economy of the entire country.

Large corporations have argued for many years that the compensation packages for CEO's need to be high in order to attract talent and reward performance. That argument is fine as long as the idea is applied evenly to failure. What ramifications are there for CEO's who destroy a company and affect the economy of many people? Being fired and finding another cushy job just doesn't seem to be proportionate when the poor person who is fired for failure has no such recourse very often.

In ancient Israel, God demanded more of the king who was a son of God and protector of his people. When punishment came, the prophets addressed God's wrath to the king who was responsible for the calamity of the people. Jesus said, "It is inevitable that scandals should come, but woe to him who has caused such scandal." May we be good stewards of the people entrusted to us, and may be work toward correcting the injustice of unequal expectations and rewards.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Justice for Immigrants

Yesterday we held our first meeting of a new diocesan initiative called Justice for Immigrants. Several people from around the diocese attended, eager to do more on this important issue. We talked about the various ways to help immigrants in our parishes and how to form Justice for Immigrants parish groups. For more information on Justice for Immigrants, visit the following website: www.justiceforimmigrants.org

Below is an editorial from this week's Catholic Key written by Bishop Robert Finn on the issue of immigration. Bishop Finn will celebrate Mass this Sunday January 11th at St. Sabina's Parish in Belton, MO at 12:15 with the immigrant community there. Please feel free to pass along this editorial to your elected representatives:

Welcoming the Stranger: the Human Rights of Migrants

Bishop Robert Finn


A central principle of Catholic social teaching is the right to emigrate. Although there is little written on the right to immigrate – that is, enter a country – clearly the right to leave a person’s country without undue restraint implies that there be places that allow and provide good people meaningful opportunities to pursue their legitimate well-being and that of their families. In his several messages for World Migration Day and the Vatican’s addresses to the United Nations, the Popes have urged such openness to those who legitimately seek relief.

Specifically the Church bases the right to migrate on three other very important human rights: the right of a family to sustenance, the priority of the family over the state, and the right of economic initiative. These three rights have their origin in the principle of the universal common good, which is defined as “the sum total of social conditions which allow people, either as groups or as individuals, to reach their fulfillment more fully and more easily” (Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church #164, cf. also Catholic Social Teaching on the Economics of Immigration, and similar articles by Andrew M. Yuengert)

As we mark the Church’s observance of Migration Week, it is important to pray and work for just federal initiatives that will accomplish worthy ends for both immigrants and the sovereignty of nations. A sound national immigration policy will help to minimize reactionary state and local solutions that sometimes grow out of political posturing and simple prejudice, and that in turn facilitate exploitation of foreign nationals.

Pope Pius XII taught that a sovereign state has a vital right to control its borders, but it is not absolute. The needs of the immigrant should be measured against the needs of receiving countries. We, as a more powerful nation, have an obligation to promote the universal good, accommodating migration flow in accord with just human principles, while not recklessly eroding the rule of law.

- Persons have the right to find opportunities in their homeland.
- Persons have the right to migrate to support themselves and their families.
- Sovereign nations have the right to control their borders.
- True refugees and asylum seekers should be afforded protection.
- The inalienable human dignity and human rights of undocumented migrants should always be respected the same as those of every human person.

Pope John Paul II pointed to the elimination of global underdevelopment as the antidote to illegal immigration. Particularly meaningful – and helpful to a global economy - would be certain long-term efforts that adjust economic inequalities between nations in such a way as to better provide workers with employment opportunities that allow them to remain at home and support themselves and their families. The creation of employment opportunities in these nations would help reduce poverty and mitigate the incentive for many migrants to look for employment in the United States.

The increasingly widespread adoption of free markets is beginning to address such global imbalances. As countries open themselves up to the world trading system, there is evidence that they will begin to catch up to the developed world. (cf. Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration. Jeffrey Sachs and Andrew Warner) Implementing economic policies that create living-wage jobs is vital, especially for foreign citizens without advanced skills.

The Church proposes several solutions, including creating a “path to citizenship” that offer some opportunities for the large number of undocumented workers to remain as legal workers, or eventually to earn citizenship. This would provide some benefit to labor markets in the United States, preserve family unity, and improve the standard of living in immigrant communities. There is appreciable evidence that migrant workers have and will continue to contribute to the U.S. economy. (cf. The Economic Benefits of Immigration, and other similar articles by George J. Borjas)

What might be some other elements of a just immigration policy? A new temporary worker program should enforce worker protections with wage levels and employment benefits that are sufficient to support a family. Serious consideration ought to be given to provisions that would include worker protections and job portability, protecting their basic rights and giving them the option to become lawful permanent residents after a specific amount of time.

A new policy will have to treat issues of border enforcement that do not intensify human trafficking and migrant deaths rather than reduce illegal crossings. There is no demonstrable evidence to suggest that the large influx of immigrants from Mexico and the Americas has compromised homeland security. The right to life and family, and even economic benefits to the Universal Common Good, must be considered alongside deliberations about appropriate border integrity.

Our nation continues to believe newcomers to be a source of energy, hope, and cultural diversity. More than that, however, we have a common faith in Jesus Christ that transcends borders, discrimination, and violence, resulting in a spirit of solidarity. We must respond in just and creative ways so that we may strengthen the faith, hope, and charity of migrants and all the People of God. May we entrust immigration reform to the prayers of St. Frances Xavier Cabrini, an immigrant to America herself, the patron saint of immigrants, and the first American citizen to be canonized. In her own time, she experienced racism, discrimination, and prejudice in seeking better conditions for immigrants. May her example and prayers lead us to enact just and humane laws for all God’s people.